MEDIAPORTAL - free MediaCenter HTPC Software - Usages of the new TV Server

Main Menu

Supporting

If you like MediaPortal please support it by making a small donation:

Awards

Home

MediaPortal News
RC1 SVN builds started MediaPortal / TV-Server 1.0 RC1 released! MediaPortal 1.0 RC1 - coming soon Announcement: MediaPortal svn installer NSIS installer for nightly TV-Server builds

Developer Blog
TVE3-EPG: Grab EPG Only Card Mapping New Version of CoreAVC released VideoEditor plugin can now cut .ts files TV Server: Episode Management is back Designing an opensource WPF engine

MediaPortal is an Open Source application ideal for turning your PC / TV into a very advanced Media Center. MediaPortal allows you to listen to your favorite music & radio, watch and store your videos and DVDs, view, schedule and record live TV as a digital video recorder and much much more. You get MediaPortal as Open Source software. This means you can help in developing MediaPortal or tweak it for your own needs with lots of innovating plugins from our great community.
Get your free copy of this outstanding media center now!

About Features Showcase Requirements Free Download

Usages of the new TV Server

on 05-10-2006

Many people were asking in the forums how the new TV-Server/Client concept will work. The following files should answer your questions:

If you want to talk with us about this examples you can do that in this forum thread.

The development of the TV server is coming along very nicely. Developers and testers are very busy at the moment.

Quote this article in website

Users' Comments (12)

Add your comment

Posted by BKCH, on 05-10-2006, , Guest

1. ...

This is just teasing now.... :)

mmm can't wait!

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by NLS, on 05-10-2006, , Guest

2. ...

definately teasing :P

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by clubkid, on 05-10-2006, , Guest

3. ...

Yeah.. This almost makes my moth run in water.. Howcome they do this to us? ;-)

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by and81, on 05-10-2006, , Guest

4. ...

If I was releasing a new version of my software with a feature that good I'd milk it too ;)

Keep up the good work guys, add this to all the recent improvements and you're gunna tip MediaPortal right over the edge. (in a good way!)

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by NLS, on 05-10-2006, , Guest

5. ...

just a small point:

if 0.2.0.5 is so large an update, doesn't it deserve to be called 0.2.1?

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by NLS, on 05-10-2006, , Guest

6. ...

(oups sorry, was thinking about 0.2.0.5 update and the tv client-server is not there... in any case 0.2.0.5 still deserves to be called 0.2.1)

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by guytpetj, on 06-10-2006, , Guest

7. ...

My 4 MP_HTPC's are in such desperate need of this. They want to have it, or should I say I want to have it.

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by infinityloop, on 06-10-2006, , Guest

8. ...

@NLS
*ts, ts, ts*
you may should TEST an nightly svn build and check the version number it shows since more than one week ;)

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by Paranoid Delusion, on 06-10-2006, , Guest

9. ...

"you may should TEST an nightly svn build and check the version number it shows since more than one week"

I knew that, just seen nothing in writing.

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by NLS, on 06-10-2006, , Guest

10. ...

What version does it show? I am a little behind SVN since 0.2. I also heard that for SVN you need 0.2.0.0 clean while I have 0.2.0.4 (and not clean). That made it more difficult.

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by Okay, on 08-10-2006, , Guest

11. ...

Any thoughts about IP TV / TVoIP and the new engine?

» Reply to this comment...

Posted by WeWe, on 09-10-2006, , Guest

12. ...

sounds very promising ... BUT:

will there be a 0.2.0.5 BEFORE the new TV engine gets out? We all know, how it is ... when a new technology is used by thousands of users in different environments first of all some errors will pop up.

I really would like to see a last 'stable' using the existing, battle proven TV engine

» Reply to this comment...

Add your comment